How Big Cloud defended itself in the U.K.

Today: The U.K.'s competition authority publishes the results of its hearings with AWS, Microsoft, and Google, how Cloudflare became a pawn in Elon Musk's fight with Brazil, and the latest moves in enterprise tech.

How Big Cloud defended itself in the U.K.
Photo by Charles Postiaux / Unsplash

Welcome to Runtime! Today: The U.K.'s competition authority publishes the results of its hearings with AWS, Microsoft, and Google, how Cloudflare became a pawn in Elon Musk's fight with Brazil, and the latest moves in enterprise tech.

(Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get Runtime each week.)


Sticky wickets

The most thorough investigation yet into the competitiveness of the cloud infrastructure computing market has been unfolding for nearly a year in the U.K., as the Competition and Markets Authority attempts to sort out whether AWS and Microsoft exert undue control over how British businesses procure cloud services. 

This week the CMA published summaries of hearings it conducted this past July with AWS, Microsoft, and Google, during which the Big Three were asked to explain their practices around topics such as software licensing and egress fees. Their answers provide an interesting look into how the cloud providers see themselves, their competitors, and the current state of the market.

Microsoft's licensing practices have come under intense scrutiny over the last year, and it has already made some concessions around how Microsoft Teams and other cloud products are consumed.

  • However, "Microsoft said that it treats server applications and operating systems differently as the latter are more tied to a specific piece of hardware," according to the CMA, in response to questions about its Azure Hybrid Benefit discounting scheme.
  • Microsoft said it changed its licensing for Windows Server in 2019 over concerns that big cloud providers wouldn't have any way to know if a customer that ran Windows Server on their clouds under its Bring Your Own License program was running that software elsewhere, unless the providers licensed that software directly from Microsoft itself.
  • But Microsoft allows smaller cloud providers to host Microsoft software without such a license, which imposes additional costs on AWS or Google Cloud customers that want to run Windows Server on those clouds.
  • "AWS said that Microsoft should have the same rules for customers on every cloud instead of singling out what are deemed as listed providers (Google, AWS and Alibaba), according to the CMA.

Egress fees have been another big point of contention over the past year, with all three cloud providers making some concessions in response to the EU Data Act. But those concessions were limited to customers that wanted to make a clean break from their provider, and all three companies defended their right to charge data egress fees for ongoing customers.

  • Google, which attempted to position itself as a hero for getting rid of switching fees, "stated that it is likely that its average egress fees are higher than those of its competitors because it has invested significantly in its infrastructure and offers better networking products," according to the CMA.
  • Likewise, "AWS said that many customers pay a higher percentage of their cloud bill on DTO fees [data transfer out, AWS's term for egress fees] simply because of the nature of the company and how it uses the cloud as they may need to push data out to their customers."
  • For its part, "Microsoft added that customers negotiate on almost everything, but they do not raise egress fees as it is not a significant issue for them."
  • Should the CMA impose remedies on egress fees for ongoing customers, all three companies said they would be forced to rethink their investment in networking technology.

The full summaries of each company's responses during the hearing (AWS, Microsoft, and Google Cloud) are worth a read, and regulators asked questions about a variety of other enterprise tech issues such as AI, multicloud, and volume discounts. The CMA is expected to wrap up its investigation by April 2025, and any potential remedies identified by that investigation could have profound effects on how cloud infrastructure services are bought and sold outside the U.K.

  • As AWS put it, "it would be operationally very difficult to restrict remedies to geographic subsets of customers given that cloud services are delivered to be available and consumed across the world."

The cloud to Ipanema

Profoundly strange dude Elon Musk is currently at odds with the government of Brazil, which has banned the hellsite formerly known as Twitter in that country for failing to comply with government requests to delete several accounts accused of spreading misinformation. This week Musk and X appeared to have found a way around that ban, but it's not clear how long the quick fix will last.

At some point this week X retained the services of Cloudflare to deliver its services to Brazliians through its content-delivery network, according to The New York Times. That allowed X to temporarily bypass blocks set up by Brazilian telecom companies, and in response the government considered blocking Cloudflare entirely, which would have enormous ramifications for any number of Brazilian websites that use its services for security or DDoS protection.

However, Cloudflare has apparently acquiesced to government requests "to isolate internet traffic from X, enabling Brazilian internet providers to easily target and block that traffic," according to the NYT report. As of publication time, it's not clear whether or not that worked.


Enterprise moves

Niraj Tolia is the new CTO of Veeam, joining the security company following its acquisition of Alcion.

Sally Jenkins is the new chief marketing officer of dbt labs, following similar roles at SentinelOne, Elastic, and Informatica.


The Runtime roundup

OpenAI opened its o1 models to ChatGPT Enterprise customers, giving them a chance to see if its latest "reasoning" models can handle more complex queries.

Disney is dumping Slack months after a major hack exposed sensitive company data, according to Status.

AWS unveiled a vulnerability disclosure program but stopped short of turning it into an actual bug bounty system that would reward security researchers for finding flaws.

Arm server chip vendor Ampere is listening to offers to purchase the company, according to Bloomberg.


Thanks for reading — see you Tuesday!

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Runtime.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.